TI AUTOMOTIVE
Smiths continues to hold, at cost, £325m
of preference shares in TI Automotive, which was demerged in July
2001. No preference dividend has been received or accrued in 2004.
GEOGRAPHICAL SPREAD AND EXCHANGE RATES
The geographical analysis of ongoing operations is largely unchanged
from 2003.
 |
 |
 |
| |
Sales |
Profits |
 |
 |
 |
| United Kingdom |
26% |
13% |
| North America |
52% |
61% |
| Continental Europe |
15% |
19% |
| Rest of World |
7% |
7% |
 |
 |
 |
The key exchange rates affecting the Group are the US dollar and
the Euro. The table below shows the average and year-end rates for
these currencies.
 |
 |
 |
| |
£1 = US$ |
£1 = Euro |
 |
 |
 |
| Average |
|
|
| 2004 |
1.75 |
1.46 |
| 2003 |
1.59 |
1.51 |
| £ (stronger)/weaker |
(10%) |
3% |
 |
 |
 |
| Yearend |
|
|
| 2004 |
1.82 |
1.51 |
| 2003 |
1.61 |
1.43 |
| £ (stronger)/weaker |
(13%) |
(6%) |
 |
 |
 |
The effect of the decline in the average value of the US dollar
outweighed the effect of the stronger Euro, as would be expected
from the geographic weighting of the business. The net translation
effect was to reduce sales by £137m and operating profits by £20m.
A movement of 1 cent in the US dollar affects profit by approximately
£1.4m. Exposure on export transactions after hedging is not material.
Information on the impact of hedging foreign exchange translation
is contained in the Treasury section below.
COST OF CAPITAL AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT
The Company uses its weighted average cost of capital as one measure
to appraise both internally-generated investment opportunities and
acquisitions. During 2004, the Company's weighted average cost of
capital for the year remained at 8%.
The after-tax return before goodwill amortisation and exceptional
items on average shareholder investment, including goodwill set
off against reserves was 11% compared with 12% last year and continues
to exceed the weighted average cost of capital.
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company applies the full accounting requirement of FRS17 to
calculate its pension expense. FRS17 is a more prescriptive accounting
treatment than SSAP24, and we consider that the greater transparency
and consistency offered are significant benefits.
Under FRS17, the Group's accounts reflect the net surplus/deficit
in retirement benefit plans, taking assets at their market values
at 31 July and evaluating liabilities by discounting at year-end
AA corporate bond interest rates.
The table below gives an analysis of the Company's year-end net
liabilities.
 |
 |
 |
| |
2004 £m |
2003 £m |
 |
 |
 |
| Funded plans |
|
|
| Assets |
2,558 |
2,468 |
| Liabilities |
(2,686) |
(2,776) |
 |
 |
 |
| Deficit |
(128) |
(308) |
| Average funding level |
95% |
89% |
 |
 |
 |
| Unfunded liabilities |
(119) |
(145) |
 |
 |
 |
| |
(247) |
(453) |
| Deferred tax |
85 |
145 |
 |
 |
 |
| Net liability |
(162) |
(308) |
 |
 |
 |
The Profit and Loss Account bears the cost of providing retirement
benefits in two places. The actuarially calculated cost of the current
year's benefits earned is charged against operating profit (the
'service cost') in 2004 this was £47m (2003 £48m). The interest
section of the profit and loss account is charged with the interest
on retirement liabilities and credited with the expected return
on pension scheme assets in 2004 this was a net credit of
£3m (2003 net charge £2m) reflecting the improved asset mix at the
beginning of the year.
Pension funding (company cash contribution) decisions are based
on the advice of independent actuaries, which takes account of the
long-term nature of the liabilities. For funding purposes, the most
recent actuarial valuations of the two principal schemes were performed
as at March and April 2003 in the United Kingdom, and January 2004
in the United States. Contributions to the funded plans were increased
to £64m in 2004 (2003 £46m), as funding deficit payments were made.
Slightly lower contributions are expected in 2005.
TREASURY
Smiths continues to apply centralised treasury management over its
financial risks operating within a strong control environment. The
Company uses financial instruments to raise finance for its operations
and to manage the related financial risks. There is neither speculation
nor trading in financial instruments and all funding is properly
recognised on the balance sheet. The Board has approved the treasury
policy, which governs the financial risk profile, and a treasury
compliance report is presented annually to the Audit Committee.
The objectives of the treasury function remain the same as in
previous years and are explained in further detail below in the
context of current developments.
To deliver the liquidity requirements of
the businesses cost effectively As referred to earlier,
liquidity was strong during the year. The Company aims to minimise
the level of surplus cash balances but where these arise, such as
with the Polymer disposal proceeds, tight controls apply to ensure
that they are securely placed with highly rated counterparties and
are available for redeployment around the Group at short notice.
Local working capital needs and capital expenditure requirements
are typically funded by local bank facilities. In addition, Smiths
has extensive local and cross-border cash-pooling arrangements,
and arm's length intercompany lending through financial centres,
to optimise the global deployment of funds across its businesses
in a tax efficient manner.
To manage the central funding demands and
provide a low cost of debt The Company funding requirements
are largely driven by acquisition activity and met by centrally
arranged debt finance. The Company holds term debt, largely in the
bond markets, of £692m with average maturity of six years and at
an average cost of debt of 4.7%. Through the use of interest rate
swaps, the Company maintains a broadly even mix of fixed and floating
rate debt. The Company seeks to maintain a spread of maturity profiles
on its debt and no more than 30% of the Company's net debt will
be held on borrowings due within one year, without firm plans for
refinancing or repayment. The €1300m Eurobond matures in July
2005 and currently Smiths could retire this debt out of surplus
cash resources. The credit ratings of the Group remain at A/A3
with Standard & Poor's and Moody's, respectively, reflecting the
Group's strong financial profile and stable business outlook. Smiths
believes that it has access to further financial resources to cater
for all envisaged business requirements and opportunities.
To develop and maintain strong and stable
banking relationships and services Smiths has a core
and stable group of ten leading global banks and financial institutions
who competitively tender for treasury business. Credit exposures
to any one bank are carefully controlled. All business is transacted
with banks on consistent terms and is fairly allocated.
To provide the Group with reasonable protection
from the effect of foreign currency volatility Material
cross-border trading contracts or forecast commitments are hedged
at inception by appropriate derivative financial instruments, with
the Company's core banks as counterparties. Whilst the trends of
foreign currency movements cannot be eliminated, this hedging programme
reduces the volatility on the results and protects the cash-flow
and margins. Moreover, Smiths largely manufactures in countries
whose currency is linked to the currency of its sales revenue, and
hence gross transactional exposures are around £300m annually, before
hedging.
The Company protects its reserves from foreign currency fluctuations
by ensuring that at least 75% of the total net overseas operational
assets are offset, either by borrowings in the respective currency
or by currency swaps.
Smiths' overseas earnings are translated at average currency rates
for the year which smooths the effect of currency volatility. However,
Smiths is increasingly exposed to the US dollar due to its significant
North American presence. Following the Interim results, a short-term
hedging contract was entered into to protect against further dollar
exchange rate volatility on the translation of US earnings for the
remaining part of the year. This contract produced a £1.4m profit
and cash inflow. |