Smiths 2003 Environmental, Health and Safety Report
EHS Commitment Who We Are Managing EHS Performance Assurance

Introduction

This section reports our performance on the key EHS aspects we have identified within Smiths:

  • Energy and water use
  • Waste management
  • Climate change
  • Air emissions
  • Contaminated land
  • Product stewardship
  • Health and safety
  • Fines and prosecutions
  • Environmental investment
  • Supply chain management

We have chosen these areas as indicators as they are common across our operations and to our activities as a manufacturing and technology group.

Our performance at a glance

Performance Area Units
Trend
(2001-2003)
2003
2002
2001
BiE Index % score
^
69
64
56
ISO 14001 Number of major manufacturing sites certified
^
77
49
36
Waste disposal to landfill Tonnes/£m sales
^
4
6
7
Greenhouse gas emissions Tonnes CO2 equivalent /£m sales
>
88
92
89
Water use M3 /£m sales
v
605
608
544
VOC emissions Kg/£m sales
>
118
134
117
Ozone depleting emissions Tonnes CFC-11 Equivalent
^
0.8
1.0
1.8
Regulatory compliance (environment) Number of enforcement actions (resulting in fines or prosecutions)
-
1
2
N/A
Lost time incidents Number of lost time incidents due to injury or illness/1000 employees
^
13
16
18
Roll out of health and safety audit protocol (AuditMaster™) Number of major sites completing at least one audit
^
59
13
0
Number of major sites scoring > 60%
^
48
8
0


Key: [^] improved situation, [>] unchanged situation [v] worsened situation

Data Quality

We have developed a set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure and drive our progress in EHS performance. Both absolute and normalised data is provided. Where normalised data is presented, we use the Group’s financial turnover, as published in the Annual Report and Accounts for the year in question for environmental performance, and use employee data i.e. actual staff numbers and man-hours worked at sites for lost time incident performance.

Significant absolute reductions in energy consumption, emissions and waste are shown in the performance charts. These are influenced by the sale of major business units - such as Polymer Sealing Solutions - during the year. We believe that normalising the data against sales and employee numbers provides more meaningful information on trends in performance.

Data collection and interpretation continues to be a challenge. Establishing meaningful trends in performance is difficult as the diverse profile of our operations can change significantly through acquisitions and divestments. We believe that the overall quality of our data has improved over time but we appreciate that there is still scope for further improvement.

Introduction
Energy and Water
Waste Management
Climate Change
Air Emissions
Contaminated Land
Productivity Stewardship
Product Highlights
Product Regulation
Health and Safety Performance
Fines & Prosecutions
Environmental Investment
Supply Chain Management
EHS Home
Site Map / GRI
Glossary
Feedback Now